Community Alliance with Family Farmers

PROGRAMS :: Watershed Stewardship Project Summary
Watershed Stewardship Project logo

During April and May 2002, CAFF's Watershed Stewardship Project surveyed farmers and landowners in Merced and Solano counties to determine which common agricultural practices were being used to protect water resources. The survey results, based on an eight-percent response rate, show a wide variety of sound practices are used in both regions.

Other findings included:

  • Primary crops being grown by respondents are fruits and nuts, alfalfa, hay, with lesser amounts of vegetables and forage crops.
  • Farm size is represented fairly evenly from 1-40 acres on the low end, rising to 501 acres or more. The highest number of respondents (19 percent) work 501 acres or more.
  • Beef cattle account for 24 percent of all livestock.

The project is funded by CalFed and wants to work with landowners interested in adjusting their farming and ranching practices to help their respective watersheds.

Differences between Merced and Solano growers are primarily in crops grown, irrigation methods, and farm size. Merced has a larger number of nut tree growers, but growers of other crops varied only slightly in the practices surveyed. Merced growers use significantly more flood and overhead irrigation than Solano growers and Solano County has smaller farm size.

Our questions asked about irrigation, livestock grazing patterns, riparian buffer strips, sedimentation and erosion control, pest management, flooding and water quality standards. The respondents generally share interest and concern for all of those issues, but the three topping their list are:

  • learning more about how government agencies can help them pay for conservation measures,
  • how current and planned water quality standards affect them,
  • and how they can monitor the quality of their tailwater themselves.

The results of this survey will in part determine the direction of the Watershed Stewardship Project.

  • We will select topics for field days based on interest levels expressed by farmers and ranchers.
  • Demonstration activities will be based on information from the survey and scientific water quality data.

Land Management Practices Survey
Watershed Stewardship Project
Survey Findings, May, 2002

We received 55 completed surveys or 47% from Merced County and 61 or 53% from Solano County.
The following percentages do not include respondents that did not answer the question. At the end of each answer set, ( n = #) represents the number of positive responses to that particular questions. In some cases, respondents answered a question with more than one response so the total number of responses exceeds 116.

1) My primary source of new agricultural information is:

Agricultural newsletters 27.9%
Trade magazines 19.9%
Other farmers 17.4%
Industry representatives 9.7%
Meetings 8.9%
University of California farm advisors 7.1%
The internet 5.8%
University of California publications 2.1%
( n = 157)

2) Which of the following were your most significant crops in the last two years?

Nut trees 36.6%
Other _____________ 13.0%
Alfalfa or hay 11.0%
Fruit trees 9.7%
Vegetables 8.3%
Forage crops 8.3%
Feed grains 6.9%
Grapes 5.5%
( n = 145)

3) What type of irrigation do you use?

Overhead sprinklers 30.5%
Flood 28.4%
Microsprinklers 15.6%
Drip 14.9%
Furrow 10.6%
( n = 141)

4) How many acres of land do you farm or ranch? (include leased, rented, and owned)

1-40 37.2%
501 or more 19.5%
201 or 500 16.8%
41-100 14.2%
101-200 12.4%
( n = 113)

5) If you manage livestock, what type of livestock do you manage?

No livestock 42.9%
Beef cattle 24.3%
Dairy cows/calves 12.9%
Sheep/goats 10.0%
Poultry 5.7%
Other 4.3%
( n = 70)

6) If you manage livestock, how many animals do you manage in a typical year?

No livestock 40.3%
1,101 or more 19.4%
1-50 15.5%
51-200 6.5%
201-500 3.2%
501 –1,000 1.6%
( n = 62)

7) If you have land directly on the river or stream, is bank erosion a problem?

No land on rivers or streams 48.0%
No 29.0%
Yes 23.0%
( n = 100)

8) If yes, what method of bank stabilization do you use?

Rip rap 40.6%
Don't use any method 31.3%
Other 12.5%
Erosion control plantings 9.4%
Setbacks to ag land to allow for flooding 6.3%
( n = 32)

9) Do you keep a strip of non-crop plants, such as grasses, natural vegetation, etc… (a buffer strip) between crop fields and waterways?

Yes 39.8%
My farm is not on a waterway 38.2%
No 8.2%
( n = 101)

10) If yes , how wide is this strip?

Over 31 feet 36.2%
11- 20 feet 27.7%
21- 30 feet 17.0%
1 - 10 feet 17.0%
Less than one foot 2.1%
( n = 47)

11) If no, please select the most important reason that you don't keep a strip of non-crop plants between crop fields and waterways.

Too much work to maintain strips 26.7%
Wastes valuable cropland 26.7%
High cost 20.0%
Other 13.3%
Encourages pests and insects on my farm 6.7%
Doesn't help clean run-off 6.7%
Looks messy 0.0%
Buffer plants migrate into crop fields 0.0%
( n = 15)

12) Which of the following practices did you use in the last two years to control sedimentation or erosion?

Reduced tillage 19.6%
No tillage 14.7%
Install or maintain a tailwater return system 14.1%
Farmed on the contour 10.4%
Applied gypsum to increase permeability 8.6%
Use sediment basin to prevent offsite erosion 7.4%
Kept vegetation on non-crop areas 6.1%
Kept a vegetated buffer near waterways 5.5%
Cover crops/resident veg in orchards/vineyards 5.5%
Other 3.7%
Leveled the land 2.5%
Changed irrigation system to drip/micro   1.8%
( n = 163)

13) Please list the letters of the practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Reduced tillage 22.8%
No tillage 15.8%
Keeping vegetation on non-crop areas 12.3%
Keeping a vegetated buffer near waterways 10.5%
Leveling the land 10.5%
Applying gypsum to increase permeability 8.8%
Using sediment basin to prevent offsite erosion 8.8%
Installing or maintaining a tailwater return system 7.0%
Cover crops/resident veg in orchards/vineyards 1.8%
Changing irrigation system to drip/micro 1.8%
Farming on the contour 0.0%
Other 0.0%
(n = 57)

14) If a crop grower, which of the following nutrient management practices did you use in the last two years?

Test irrigation water for nitrate levels budget 27.3%
Protect wellheads from nutrient pollution 8.6%
Cover crop nutrient values in nitrogen budget 7.0%
Apply nitrogen in small applications over growing season 5.1%
Annual tissue analysis to determine crop needs 3.0%
An annual soil test to determine nutrient levels .0%
Other .1%
( n = 187)

15) Please list the letters of the practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Protecting wellheads from nutrient pollution 26.2%
Annual tissue analysis to determine crop needs 21.3%
Testing irrigation water for nitrate levels budget 18.0%
Annual soil test to determine nutrient levels 16.4%
Cover crop nutrient values in nitrogen budget 11.5%
Applying nitrogen in small applications over growing season 4.9%
(n = 61)

16) If a crop grower, which of the following pest management practices did you use in the last two years?

Vegetative buffer of at least 35 feet between crop fields/waterways 17.3%
Monitored insect pests weekly during the season 14.2%
Install or maintain a tailwater return system 11.9%
Hired a private pesticide service 10.6%
Store pesticides on a non-permeable surface 9.7%
Consider impacts to beneficial insects when selecting pesticide 6.6%
Avoid use of Diazinon or Chlorpyrifos (Dursban, Lorsban) 6.6%
Monitor diseases weekly during the season 5.3%
Released beneficial insects 4.9%
Eonomic injury levels to determine if a pesticide application necessary 4.0%
Use approved organic methods only 2.7%
Install or kept insectary plantings/hedgerows 2.2%
Maintain a distance of at least 100 feet between
waterways or wells and pesticide mixing and storage areas. 1.8%
Use degree days to determine proper timing for pesticide applications 1.3%
Other .9%
( n = 226)

17) Please list the letters of the practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Monitoring diseases weekly during the season 18.4%
Using degree days to determine proper timing for pesticide applications 18.4%
Storing pesticides on a non-permeable surface 10.5%
Economic injury levels to determine if a pesticide application necessary 10.5%
Monitoring insect pests weekly during the season 7.9%
Vegetative buffer of at least 35 feet between crop fields/waterways 5.3%
Considering impacts to beneficial insects when selecting pesticide 5.3%
Avoid use of Diazinon or Chlorpyrifos (Dursban, Lorsban) 5.3%
Releasing beneficial insects 5.3%
Other 5.3%
Installing or maintaining a tailwater return system 2.6%
Maintaining a distance of at least 100 feet between 2.6%
       waterways or wells and pesticide mixing and storage areas.
Using approved organic methods only 2.6%
Installing or keeping insectary plantings/hedgerows 0.0%
Hiring a private pesticide service 0.0%
( n = 38)

18) Which of the following habitat management practices did you use in the last two years?

Install wildlife habitat on some portion of the farm 27.2%
Install owl/bat/duck boxes or similar structures on the farm 21.4%
Install plantings that encourage beneficial insects 20.9%
Install native plants on the river/stream bank 12.1%
Install or kept trees that shade the river or stream. 8.1%
Determine if threatened/endangered species exist on the farm 5.2%
A buffer of at least 35 feet between farming operations and waterways 3.4%
Kept some part of the farm in a conservation easement .6%
Manage cereal crops so that they were compatible with wildlife .6%
Other .6%
( n = 173)

19) Please list the letters of the practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Installing owl/bat/duck boxes or similar structures on the farm 26.7%
Installing plantings that encourage beneficial insects 24.4%
Installing wildlife habitat on some portion of the farm 17.8%
Keeping some part of the farm in a conservation easement 11.1%
Determining if threatened/endangered species exist on the farm 4.4%
Installing native plants on the river/stream bank 4.4%
Keeping a buffer of at least 35 feet between farming operations and waterways 4.4%
Managing cereal crops so that they were compatible with wildlife 4.4%
Installing or keeping trees that shade the river or stream. 2.2%
Other 0.0%
( n = 45)

20) If a grazing manager, which of the following grazing management practices did you use in the last two years?

Rotate pastures so they receive alternate periods of grazing and rest 25.0%
No streams on property 23.2%
Left at least 2 inches of residual dry matter after grazing 16.1%
Place mineral blocks to enhance cattle distribution 12.5%
Place watering troughs to attract livestock away from streams 8.9%
Avoid grazing on wet soils 7.1%
Use fences to reduce grazing pressure in streams 3.6%
Other 3.6%
(n = 56)

21) Please list the letters of the practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Place watering troughs to attract livestock away from streams 1
Rotate pastures so they receive alternate periods of grazing and rest 1
Leaving at least 2 inches of residual dry matter after grazing 1
Using fences to reduce grazing pressure in streams 0
Avoiding grazing on wet soils 0
Placing mineral blocks to enhance cattle distribution 0
Other 0
No streams on property 0
( n = 3)

22) If a confined livestock operator, which of these nutrient management practices did you use in the last two years? (Circle all that apply)

Ensured lagoon was sized for 120 day holding capacity 28.0%
Produced or kept a nutrient management plan 24.0%      
Installed or kept a tailwater return system 16.0%
Adjust application rates of lagoon water based on measured nutrient content 12.0%
Applied dairy nutrients to be timed with crop uptake 8.0%
Exported nutrients to neighboring farms 8.0%
Composted manure solids 4.0%
Other 0.0%
( n = 25)

23) Please list the letter of practices above that you would be interested in learning more about.

Produced or kept a nutrient management plan 2
Composted manure solids 2
Applied dairy nutrients to be timed with crop uptake 1
Exported nutrients to neighboring farms 0
Adjust application rates of lagoon water based on measured nutrient content 0
Installed or kept a tailwater return system 0
Ensured lagoon was sized for 120 day holding capacity  
Other 0

24) Are you concerned that your tailwater may not meet current water quality standards?

Not concerned 60.0%
Somewhat concerned 30.0%
Very concerned 10.0%  
( n = 66)

25) If very concerned or concerned, circle the area of greatest concern with your tailwater.

Agricultural chemical residue 40.0%
Nutrients from livestock 26.7%
Soil sedimentation 16.7%
Minerals or salts 13.3%  
Other 3.3%
Pathogens 0.0%
( n = 30)

26) Are you concerned that storm or flood run-off from your farm may not meet current water quality standards?

Not concerned 62.8%
Somewhat concerned 27.9%  
Very concerned 9.3%
( n = 86)

27) If very concerned or concerned, circle the area of greatest concern with storm or flood water run-off.

Agricultural chemical residue 32.4%
Nutrients from livestock 29.4%
Soil sedimentation 23.5%    
Minerals or salts 8.8%  
Other 1.7%
Pathogens 0.0%
 
( n = 34)

28) Circle the three topics that would be of greatest value to you at a workshop.

Cost share programs with government agencies 23.0%
How current and planned water quality standards affect me 22.5%
How I can privately monitor the quality of water myself 22.5%
Help in getting permits for on-farm conservation projects 17.0%
How I can privately identify endangered plant/animal species on my farm 7.5%
Conservation or Agricultural Conservation easements 5.5%
Methane digesters for confined livestock operations 2.0%
 
( n = 200)

Home  / /  Programs  / /  Media  / /  Policy  / /  Publications  / /  Contact

created and maintained by taibou dia